|
Stages of History | Revolutionary
Cultural Productions
Literature and Art Workers Hold Rally for Great
Proletarian Cultural Revolution
Peking Review, no. 50, December 9, 1966, pp. 5-9
* Important speeches were made by Comrades Chou En-lai, Chen Po-ta
and Chiang Ching.
* The rally called upon the revolutionary fighters in literature and art
throughout the country to hold high the great red banner of Mao Tse-tung's
thought, give prominence to proletarian politics, resolutely implement
the proletarian revolutionary line represented by Chairman Mao, thoroughly
criticize and repudiate the bourgeois reactionary line, unite on the basis
of the principles of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Tse-tung's thought, complete
the tasks of struggle, criticism and transformation and strive to create
the most splendid new proletarian literature and art in human history.
* The Military Commission of the Party's Central Committee appointed Comrade
Chiang Ching adviser on cultural work to the Chinese People's Liberation
Army and decided to incorporate the No. 1 Peking Opera Company of Peking
and three other units into the P.L.A.
More than 20,000 revolutionary workers in the field of literature and
art from Peking and other parts of China held a rally for the great proletarian
cultural revolution in the magnificent Great Hall of the People in Peking
on the evening of November 28.
Comrade Chou En-lai, Standing Committee Member of the Political Bureau
of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and Premier of
the State Council; Comrade Chen Po-ta, Standing Committee Member of the
Political Bureau and leader of the cultural revolution group under the
Party's Central Committee; and Comrade Chiang Ching, first deputy leader
of the cultural revolution group under the Party's Central Committee and
adviser on cultural work to the Chinese People's Liberation Army, attended
the rally and made important speeches.
The rally took place amid the excellent situation which prevailed following
the eight separate reviews of a total of more than 11 million members
of the mighty army of the cultural revolution by Chairman Mao Tse-tung,
the great teacher, great leader, great supreme commander and great helmsman
of the Chinese people, and at a time when tremendous victories had been
won by the proletarian revolutionary line represented by Chairman Mao.
The rally became a pledge of a general offensive by China's mighty revolutionary
contingents in literature and art against the handful of persons in authority
in literary and art circles who took the capitalist road, and against
the counter-revolutionary revisionist line in literature and art which
they represented. It is bound to push the great proletarian cultural revolution
forward in the world of literature and art with great vigor and guide
the victorious advance of the mighty revolutionary contingents in literature
and art throughout China in the direction indicated by Chairman Mao Tse-tung.
Comrade Chen Po-ta's Opening Address
Comrade Chen Po-ta presided over the meeting. In his opening address he
said:
Today's meeting is one of great significance. Historically, cultural revolutions,
in most cases, begin in the field of literature and art. This is also
true of the great proletarian cultural revolution we are now carrying
out.
Mao Tse-tung's thought is the guide for China's great proletarian cultural
revolution. Comrade Mao Tse-tung has creatively developed the Marxist-Leninist
theory of literature and art. Using the proletarian world outlook, he
has systematically and thoroughly solved the problems on our literary
and art front. At the same time, he has systematically and thoroughly
blazed for us a completely new trail for the proletarian cultural revolution.
At the Tenth Plenary Session of the Eighth Central Committee of the Chinese
Communist Party in 1962, Chairman Mao Tse-tung called for taking firm
hold of the class struggle in the ideological field. Following this great
call and under the direct guidance of Mao Tse-tung's thought, there has
been an upsurge in reforming Peking opera, ballet, symphonic music and
other art forms -- revolutionary reforms designed to make the ancient
serve the present, to make foreign things serve China and to weed through
the old to let the new emerge. Peking opera and other art forms have been
used to portray the epic of the heroic struggles of the masses led by
the Chinese proletariat. This new creation has given Peking opera, ballet,
symphonic music and other art forms a new lease of life, not only making
them completely new in content but greatly improved in form and different
in appearance from before. Plays on contemporary revolutionary themes
have appeared on the stage everywhere. The new proletarian literature
and art has an unprecedented appeal for the masses. The reactionaries
and counter-revolutionary revisionists, however, revile and bitterly hate
this new literature and art for no other reason but because the role of
this new literature and art will greatly enhance our people's political
consciousness and will greatly strengthen the dictatorship of the proletariat
and the socialist system in our country.
I want to say here that, among the comrades who have persisted in this
policy of revolution in literature and art and waged unremitting struggles
against the reactionaries and counter-revolutionary revisionists. Comrade
Chiang Ching has made outstanding contributions.
History has smashed the pipe dream of the reactionaries and counter-revolutionary
revisionists. The revolution in literature and art after the Tenth Plenary
Session of the Eighth Central Committee of the Party became the real beginning
of our country's great proletarian cultural revolution
The history of literature and art is full of sharp conflicts. The conflicts
between the new and the old and between the modern and the ancient are
reflections of the class struggle in society. The bourgeois in the period
of the bourgeois revolution used the new literature and art of the time
as an important weapon in destroying feudalism. Likewise, the proletariat
today must use its own new literature and art serving the workers, peasants
and soldiers as a weapon in destroying the bourgeoisie and all other exploiting
classes. After the conquest of political power by the proletariat, the
bourgeoisie is not reconciled to quitting the stage of history. Chairman
Mao has often pointed out to us that the overthrown bourgeoisie is trying,
by all methods, to use the position of literature and art as a hotbed
for corrupting the masses and preparing for the restoration of capitalism.
Therefore, our tasks in the field of literature and art are not lighter
but heavier. Our leadership on the literary and art front should not be
weakened but, on the contrary, strengthened still further. In order to
fulfill their glorious tasks, our revolutionary literary and art organizations
must carry the great proletarian cultural revolution through to the end!
It is utterly wrong to deny that there are conflicts in literature and
art so long as classes still exist. In the future communist society, when
classes have been eliminated and class contradictions and struggles no
longer exist, there will still be conflicts between the new and the old,
conflicts which we cannot yet foresee completely or are impossible for
us to foresee now. Such conflicts, naturally, will also find their expression
in literature and art.
Speech by Comrade Chiang Ching
Comrade Chiang Ching received a thunderous ovation from the entire rally
when she went forward to speak.
She described how she came to understand the importance of the great proletarian
cultural revolution. Comrade Chiang Ching said: A few years ago, when
my fairly systematic contact with certain sections of literature and art
began, the first question that arose in my mind was why were plays about
ghosts being staged in socialist China? Then also, I was very surprised
to find that Peking opera, insensitive as it was to reflecting reality,
produced Hai Jui Dismissed from Office, Li Hui-niang and other plays showing
seriously reactionary political tendencies. And under the fine pretext
of "rediscovering tradition," many works were written portraying
emperors, kings, generals and prime ministers, scholars and beauties.
There was great talk throughout the literary and art world about "famous
plays", "foreign plays" and "ancient plays" and
it went out of its way to present them. The atmosphere was choked with
emphasis on the ancient as against the contemporary, with worship of the
foreign and scorn for the Chinese, with praise or the dead and contempt
for the living. I began to feel that if our literature and art could not
correspond to the socialist economic base, they would inevitably wreck
it.
Comrade Chiang Ching went on: In the wake of the changing struggle between
the new and the old in the political and economic fields over a number
of years, new literature and art, countering the old, have also made their
appearance. New items have been created even in Peking opera, formerly
considered the most difficult to reform. As you all know, Lu Hsun was
the great standard-bearer leading the cultural revolution over thirty
years ago. More than twenty years ago, Chairman Mao defined the orientation
for literature and art as service to the workers, peasants and soldiers
and he posed the question of weeding through the old to let the new emerge.
To weed through the old to let the new emerge means to develop new content
which meets the needs of the masses and popular national forms loved by
the people. As far as content is concerned, it is in many cases out of
the question to weed through the old to let the new emerge. How can we
critically assimilate ghosts, gods and religion? I hold it is impossible,
because we are atheists and Communists. We do not believe in ghosts and
gods at all. Again, for instance, the feudal moral precepts of the landlord
class and the moral precepts of the bourgeoisie, which they considered
to be indisputable, were used to oppress and exploit the people. Can we
critically assimilate things which were used to oppress and exploit the
people? I hold it is impossible, because ours is a country of the dictatorship
of the proletariat. We want to build socialism. Our economic base is public
ownership. We firmly oppose the system of private ownership whereby people
are oppressed and exploited. To sweep away all remnants of the system
of exploitation and the old ideas, culture, customs and habits of all
the exploiting classes is an important aspect of our great proletarian
cultural revolution.
Comrade Chiang Ching continued: As for the old forms of art, our attitude
can neither be nihilist nor one of total acceptance. A nation must have
its own forms of art, its own artistic characteristics. It is wrong to
be nihilist and not take over, in a critical way, the best there is in
the art forms and artistic characteristics of our motherland. On the other
hand, it is also wrong to take everything as positive and not weed through
the old to let the new emerge. As to the outstanding forms of art of the
various nations throughout the world, we must act in accordance with Chairman
Mao's instructions about "making foreign things serve China"
and work at weeding through the old to let the new emerge.
Comrade Chiang Ching said: Imperialism is moribund capitalism, parasitic
and rotten. Modern revisionism is a product of imperialist policies and
a variety of capitalism. They cannot produce any works that are good.
Capitalism has a history of several centuries; nevertheless, it has produced
only a pitiful number of "classics." They have created some
works modeled after the "classics," but these are stereotyped
and can no longer appeal to the people, and are therefore completely on
the decline. On the other hand, there are some things that really flood
the market, such as rock-and-roll, jazz, strip-tease, impressionism, symbolism,
abstractionism, fauvism, modernism -- there's no end to them -- all of
which are intended to poison and paralyze the minds of the people. In
a word, there is decadence and obscenity to poison and paralyze the minds
of the people.
I'd like to ask: Isn't it necessary to make a revolution and introduce
changes if the old literature and art do not correspond to the socialist
economic base and the classical artistic forms do not entirely fit the
socialist ideological content? (shouts of yes! yes! from the audience)
I am sure most comrades and friends will agree it is necessary, but it
must be conceded that this involves serious class struggle and is a very
painstaking and fairly difficult job. Fear of the difficulties involved
was greater than it need have been among people in general because for
a long time the anti-Party, antisocialist leadership of the old Propaganda
Department of the Party Central Committee and the old Ministry of Culture
thought up many "reasons" for opposing this revolution and undermining
the reform. There was also a handful of people with ulterior motives who
attempted to undermine the revolution and oppose change. The reform of
Peking opera, the ballet and symphonic music was brought about only after
breaking through these difficulties and obstacles.
Comrade Chiang Ching pointed out that the nationwide great proletarian
cultural revolution China had moved into since last May had affected almost
the whole sphere of ideology. She touched on the question of the sending
of cultural revolution work teams to various organizations and said this
organizational form, of sending work teams, in the great proletarian cultural
revolution was erroneous. And what these work teams had done in the course
of their work was still more erroneous! Instead of directing the spearhead
against the handful of people in authority within the Party who were taking
the capitalist road and against the reactionary academic "authorities,"
they turned the spearhead against the revolutionary students. The question
of what the spearhead of the struggle should be directed against was a
cardinal question of right and wrong, one of principles of Marxism-Leninism,
of Mao Tse-tung's thought! As early as June this year our Chairman Mao
made the point that work teams should not be sent out hastily, but a few
comrades sent out work teams hastily without asking Chairman Mao's permission.
But it is necessary to point out that the question lies not in the form
of the work team but in the principles and policy which it follows. In
some units no work teams were sent in, and the original persons in charge
were relied upon to conduct the work, yet mistakes were made there nevertheless.
On the other hand, some work teams followed correct principles and policy
and did not make mistakes. This helps to illustrate the real question
at issue.
Comrade Chiang Ching said: Chairman Mao received a million young revolutionary
fighters on August 18. How well he respected the initiative of the masses,
trusted them and cared for them! I felt I had learnt far from enough.
Then, afterwards, the young Red Guard fighters turned outward to society
and vigorously began destroying the old ideas, culture, customs and habits.
We, the comrades of the Cultural Revolution Group under the Party Central
Committee, rejoiced. But a few days later, new problems cropped up. We
immediately gathered the facts and investigated and were therefore able
to keep up with the constantly developing revolutionary situation. This
is what I have described as striving to follow Mao Tse-tung's thought
closely on the one hand, and striving to catch up with the spirit of daring
and courage, the revolutionary rebel spirit, of the young revolutionaries
on the other.
Comrade Chiang Ching then concentrated on the great cultural revolution
in the No. 1 Peking Opera Company of Peking. She said that this company
was the first unit in Peking to undertake the glorious task of reforming
Peking opera. Directly addressing the opera company, she said: Guided
by Mao Tse-tung's thought, in a matter of a few years you have indeed
achieved good results in the work of creating operas on contemporary revolutionary
themes, and you have thus set an example to the whole country in the reform
of Peking opera.
She said: In order to enable plays on contemporary revolutionary themes
to be presented at the National Day celebrations, we had many discussions
and we supported your performances and opposed the wrong views by which
attempts were made to negate your achievements in revolution. We did a
certain amount of explanatory work in various circles to enable you to
present your Sha Chia Pang (a Peking opera on a contemporary
revolutionary theme) and to get on to the stage the Peking operas The
Red Lantern, Taking the Bandits' Stronghold,
Sea Harbour, and Raid on the White Tiger Regiment,
the ballets The Red Detachment of Women and The
White-Haired Girl, and symphonic music Sha Chia Pang,
etc.
We explained that these creative works were an important triumph of the
great proletarian cultural revolution and of Chairman Mao's thinking on
literature and art in the service of the workers, peasants and soldiers.
And, as facts have proved, the broad masses have recognized our achievements.
The revolutionary Marxist-Leninists and the revolutionary people all over
the world have placed a high evaluation on them. Chairman Mao and his
close comrade-in-arms Comrade Lin Piao, Comrade Chou En-hi, Comrade Chen
Po-ta, Comrade Kang Sheng and many other comrades have affirmed our achievements
and given us great support and encouragement.
She said: I hope that after we have gone through the struggle and tempering
in this great proletarian cultural revolution, we will continue ceaselessly
to integrate ourselves with the workers, peasants and soldiers. In this
way, we will surely be able to gain new achievements in the reform of
Peking opera and other branches of literature and art! Our task is difficult.
But we must bravely shoulder this glorious, but arduous, revolutionary
task.
Comrade Chiang Ching said that in the great proletarian cultural revolution
in the No. 1 Peking Opera Company of Peking there was a very sharp and
very complicated class struggle, a struggle for power between the proletariat
and the bourgeoisie. She said: You have as yet not exposed and criticized
the counter-revolutionary revisionist line of the former Peking Municipal
Party Committee in a really penetrating and extensive way. Here it is
necessary in all seriousness to point out that certain leading members
of the No. 1 Peking Opera Company of Peking have not yet seriously drawn
a clear-cut line between themselves and the former Peking Municipal Party
Committee. They have neither exposed the crimes of the former Peking Municipal
Party Committee in a penetrating way nor made a serious criticism of their
own mistakes. They implemented the counter-revolutionary revisionist line
of the former Peking Municipal Party Committee. Resorting to double dealing,
and by either soft or tough methods, they resisted Chairman Mao's instructions,
and by double-faced tactics carried out all kinds of obstruction and sabotage
to undermine the reform of Peking opera. They played many infamous tricks
in their attacks both on you and on us.
The heinous crimes in which the former Peking Municipal Party Committee,
the old Propaganda Department of the Party's Central Committee and the
old Ministry of Culture ganged up against the Party and the people must
be exposed and liquidated in a thoroughgoing way. Likewise, the bourgeois
reactionary line within our Party which opposes the proletarian revolutionary
line of the Party's Central Committee headed by Chairman Mao must be exposed
and criticized in a thoroughgoing way. Otherwise, it will be impossible
to safeguard the fruits of our successful revolution.
Certain leading members of the No. 1 Peking Opera Company of Peking must
make a clean breast of what they have done and reveal what the others
have done in a thoroughgoing way. This is the only way, and there is no
other way out. If they really do it after full criticism by the masses,
if they "repent genuinely and make a fresh start," they will
still be able to take part in the revolution. If they really try to correct
their errors and begin anew, if they return to the correct road of the
Party, it is still possible for them to strive to become good cadres.
She said: Since the counter-revolutionary revisionist line of the former
Peking Municipal Communist Party Committee, the old Propaganda Department
of the Party's Central Committee and the old Ministry of Culture has not
yet been thoroughly criticized and repudiated, and since the effects of
this counter-revolutionary revisionist line on your company have not yet
been wiped out, it is impossible for the great proletarian cultural revolution
to be conducted thoroughly in your company. And there is the possibility
that the movement in your company may go astray and certain people with
ulterior motives may usurp the leadership. This would have very harmful
effects on the future development of your company.
She added: It is not the case in your company that all the cadres, Party
members and Youth League members have made mistakes, or that all the cadres
have made the same kind of mistakes. They have to e treated differently,
by presenting the facts and reasoning things out, with the attitude of
"learning from past mistakes and avoiding future ones and curing
the sickness to save the patient." They should be allowed to correct
their mistakes and devote themselves to the revolution.
She emphasized that in the great proletarian cultural revolution, the
struggle had to be conducted by reasoning and not by coercion or force.
There must be no beating of people. Struggle by coercion or by force can
only touch the skin and flesh while struggle by reasoning can touch the
soul.
She said: I suggest that you hold fast to the general orientation in the
struggle, to the correct principles and policy formulated by the Central
Committee of the Party and Chairman Mao, oppose the handful of people
in authority who are taking the capitalist road, gradually expand and
strengthen the ranks of the Left in the course of the struggle, and unite
with the overwhelming majority, including those who have been misled,
and help them on to the correct road.
Referring to the question of "minority" and "majority,"
she said one could not talk about a "minority" or "majority"
independently of class viewpoint. It is necessary to see who has grasped
the truth of Marxism-Leninism, of Mao Tse-tung's thought, who is really
maintaining a proletarian revolutionary stand, who is genuinely carrying
out the correct line of Chairman Mao. Separate and concrete analysis should
be made with regard to each different organization.
In conclusion Comrade Chiang Ching said: I hope that all comrades in the
company will raise still higher the great red banner of Mao Tse-tung's
thought, give prominence to proletarian politics, resolutely carry out
the proletarian revolutionary line represented by Chairman Mao and thoroughly
criticize and repudiate the bourgeois reactionary line, unite on the basis
of the principles of Marxism-Leninism, of Mao Tse-tung's thought, and
complete the three tasks -first, of struggling against and crushing those
in authority who are taking the capitalist road; second, of criticizing
and repudiating the reactionary bourgeois academic "authorities"
and the ideology of the bourgeoisie and all other exploiting classes;
and third, of transforming education, literature and art and all other
parts of the superstructure not in correspondence with the socialist economic
base-and that you will make the No. 1 Peking Opera Company of Peking an
exemplary revolutionary company which is truly proletarianized and militant!
|